Healthy Living

Do NOT read this!

Hi family, there are many misconceptions about sugar.  Just because it's sugar-free doesn't mean it's "healthier" for you.  Just because it's fruit, doesn't mean the sugar is "healthy for you." Thanks for checking out the below.  It's really good.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/19/healthy-sugar-sugars_n_5315969.html?utm_hp_ref=healthy-living

Sorry, But There's No Such Thing As A 'Healthy' Sugar

The Huffington Post  | by  Rebecca Adams

sugar

Infographic designed by Noelle Campbell

 

We hate to be the bearers of bad news, but we feel the need to clarify a common misconception: There's no such thing as a "healthy" sugar. Or even a "less bad" sugar. Your body doesn't care if it's "organic" or "unrefined" or "all-natural," and it certainly doesn't care if Gwyneth Paltrow deems it suitable for her children's consumption.

Done hyperventilating? Now let's delve into the nutritional science behind this.

First things first: All sugar is sugar.

It's no secret that consuming sugar in large quantities has deleterious effects on your health -- studies have linked it to obesity, diabetes and increased risk of heart disease, to name a few. Sure, you need carbohydrates, which include both complex and simple sugars, for your body to break down and convert to energy. But it's the added sugars that sweeten some of your favorite foods and beverages that you need to watch out for.

So why can added sugars like agave nectar, raw honey or coconut palm sugar never really be deemed "healthy"? Because, as Dr. Marion Nestle, the Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies and Public Health at New York University, put it, "Sugar is sugar, alas." Meaning: No matter what type of sugar you consume -- whether it's table sugar or maple syrup chock full of "vitamins" and "minerals" -- your blood sugar goes up. "Minerals don't counter calories or hormones," Nestle told The Huffington Post.

And it's those pesky calories that link deceptively "healthy" sugars with the regular refined stuff. Dr. Jaimie Davis, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Nutritional Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin, explained to The Huffington Post, "Ultimately, they're all having similar effects on obesity and metabolic disorders. There's no data that suggests that if you consume more calories from honey, you store it differently."

And by "sugar," we mean a combination of fructose and glucose.

To understand why "sugar is sugar," one must know what it is in the first place. What we commonly refer to as table sugar is actually sucrose, a compound composed of 50 percent glucose and 50 percent fructose. Most caloric sweeteners, including the so-called "healthy" ones, contain some ratio of glucose and fructose, which trigger key reactions in your body. Kristin Kirkpatrick, a registered dietitian and manager of wellness nutrition services for the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, told The Huffington Post that when you consume sugar, the metabolic process begins the minute the sugar reaches your mouth. But the majority is ultimately absorbed in the small intestine, where the sugar is metabolized and absorbed into your blood. Enzymes from the stomach then convert the sugar into glucose, your body's preferred energy source. While it can provide your cells with fuel, something your body and brain need for proper functioning, glucose can cause excess weight gain. It spikes your insulin and blood sugar levels, plus it's absorbed and used up quickly.

"Insulin is the chaperone that takes the sugar into your cells where -- after your body immediately takes what it needs -- it's transformed into glycogen, stored and ready to be drawn on by the body for energy," she explained, noting that this is a very basic explanation of the metabolic process.

Fructose, or "fruit sugar," is metabolized differently, since the liver does most of the metabolizing and your insulin levels don't spike quite as much as when you ingest glucose (this is due to the lower glycemic index of fructose). That can make fructose sound like glucose's better half, but it's not true: insulin triggers the hormonal response that tells your brain you're full. Fructose doesn't elicit this reaction, so it's easier to overeat. The effects of sugars higher in fructose is a controversial topic in the nutrition world, since fructose is often blamed for adverse health conditions -- like increased LDLleptin resistance and uric acid increase -- and fructose is the form most likely to be added to foods, Kirkpatrick explained. Fructose may be tolerable in small amounts but more and more research is being conducted to determine if even small amounts put you at risk for metabolic disorders like insulin resistance. It's worth noting that some so-called "healthy" sugars, like agave nectar, are even higher in fructose than table sugar.

While sugar is never "healthy," you can certainly adopt mindful sugar consumption habits.

The problem with calling sugars "healthy" is the health halo effect, which makes people feel better about eating more of it. But Davis conceded, "I have heard that people who use honey and agave are a little bit more health-conscious, so they might use less, which would have a beneficial effect." And that's the trick when it comes to sugar: just use less of it. Yup, Mary Poppins wasn't so off-base with that whole "spoonfull of sugar" theory, after all.

When incorporating sugar into your diet, keep in mind that the World Health Organization recommends that added sugars make up no more than 10 percent of your calorie intake, while the American Heart Association wants women to consume less than 100 calories and men to consume less than 150 calories of added sugars a day. And it doesn't matter if it's organic molasses or plain old Domino sugar -- it's thequantity that makes all the difference.

So when it comes to trying to decipher between sugars higher in either glucose or fructose, it's very much a "choose your poison" scenario. You don't have to cut out added sugar altogether per se -- the bottom line, according to Nestle, Davis and Kirkpatrick, is to limit your sugar intake no matter what the source. And don't let yourself get too smug for choosing the raw, "all-natural" or "healthy" sugar du jour.

MERS! What you need to know (CNN)

Friends and Family, please take a minute to educate yourself about MERS. - Dr. Dale

l

---------

MERS: 5 things to know

By Ashley Hayes, CNN
updated 10:48 AM EDT, Wed May 14, 2014

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/02/health/mers-5-things/index.html?hpt=he_c2

(CNN) -- MERS-CoV, short for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus, first surfaced in Saudi Arabia in spring 2012.

As of Wednesday, 571 cases of MERS have been confirmed in 18 countries, according to the World Health Organization. Two of those cases were in the United States. There have been 171 deaths worldwide.

Here are five things you should know about MERS:

It's a coronavirus

MERS is in the same family of viruses as SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome -- coronavirus) as well as the common cold. However, unlike SARS, which sickened more than 8,000 people in 2003 and killed 773 worldwide, MERS does not spread easily between humans -- at least not yet.

The virus acts like a cold and attacks the respiratory system, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said. But symptoms, which include fever and a cough, are severe and can lead to pneumonia and kidney failure. Gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea have also been seen, according to the WHO.

The average age of MERS victims is 51, officials say, although the ages range from 2 to 94.

Researchers don't know how MERS spreads

Although all MERS cases have been linked to six countries on the Arabian Peninsula, limited human-to-human transmission has been seen among people in close contact with patients, including health care workers.

Although such transmission appears to be limited, health officials are concerned about MERS because of its virulence -- it can be fatal in up to one-third of cases, Dr. Anne Schuchat, assistant surgeon general for the U.S. Public Health Service and director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said Friday.

"The virus has not shown to spread in a sustained way in communities," the CDC says on its website.

The WHO and CDC have not issued any travel warnings related to MERS, although the CDC suggests travelers to the Arabian Peninsula practice "enhanced precautions."

And "you are not considered to be at risk for MERS-CoV infection if you have not had close contact, such as caring for or living with someone who is being evaluated for MERS-CoV infection," according to the CDC website.

Camels appear to be a link in the MERS chain

Camels may be one clue. In a paper published earlier this week, researchers said they had isolated the live MERS virus from two single-humped camels, known as dromedaries. And in February, scientists published a finding that nearly three-quarters of camels in Saudi Arabia tested positive for past MERS exposure.

MERS was also found in a bat in Saudi Arabia, the CDC says.

"The way humans become infected from an animal and/or environmental source is still under investigation," the WHO said last month.

It may have a seasonal pattern

Officials have noted a surge in MERS cases this spring, and a similar increase was also seen last spring, Schuchat said on Friday. But they don't know whether the factors that lead to MERS may have a seasonal pattern, or whether the virus changes to become more easily transmissible.

There are no treatments and no vaccine

As of now, doctors can treat symptoms of MERS, such as fever or breathing difficulties, Schuchat said. However, there is no vaccine and no specific medicine, such as an antiviral drug, that targets MERS.

Constipated? Swallow thisSSss.

How amazing is this?! Live a healthy day!

-- Dr. Dale

l

------

Vibrating capsule may relieve chronic constipation

http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2014/05/06/vibrating-capsule-may-relieve-chronic-constipation/

A vibrating capsule may provide relief for those who suffer from chronic constipation, according to a small study presented at Digestive Disease Week, an annual meeting of gastroenterologists, hepatologists, endoscopy specialists and GI surgeons.

Twenty-six study participants, who all suffer from chronic idiopathic constipation or constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), were asked to take a vibrating capsule twice a week and then complete a questionnaire, according to the study, presented Saturday.

More than half of the 26 patients experienced an increase in bowel movements, says Dr. Yishai Ron, lead study author and director of Neurogastroenterology and Motility at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. "The number of bowel movements rose from around two to nearly four bowel movements per week – this was an average figure.” Ron adds patients also saw a decrease in constipation symptoms.

In addition, patients reported minimal side effects. Before participating in the study, patients were asked to refrain from using laxatives for two weeks before ingesting the capsule.

"The vibrating of the capsule induces a motor activity of the large bowel which moves content forward and helps expel it out," says Ron.

The concept is based on the current technology where a patient swallows a video-chip capsule to allow doctors to capture pictures inside the bowels instead of undergoing a standard endoscopy, Emory Saint Joseph's Hospital gastroenterologist Dr. Tom McGahan said in an e-mail.

This new capsule doesn't take any pictures, but rather acts as a "small engine" which stimulates the bowel nerves, says McGahan, thus creating vibrations that help induces bowel peristalsis. "Peristalsis is the coordinated wave-like action of the intestine muscles that propels bowel contents along."

"This is a new concept - not yet proven true or effective, but novel at least," says McGahan. He adds this is just a pilot study to assess safety and it's not proof that this capsule is more effective than other treatments.

"No conclusion as to the benefit of the capsule can be made from this study because of the small number of people tested, that they all knew they took the Vibrant Capsule (it was not a blinded study), and they did not compare this group of 25 to a similar group who received no treatment (control group)," he says.

Ron admits more research needs to be done but says he is hopeful "this might be a revolutionary solution for constipation," especially since patients found relief after taking only two capsules per week. "It's a non-chemical medical device, no side effects, nothing is absorbed, there were minimal side effects with maximal effects."

Chronic constipation affects about 16% of people in the United States, according to a 2010 study in American Journal of Gastroenterology. Dr. Ron says, "this is a chronic syndrome and these people suffer daily from this inconvenience," and he adds, "most people are unsatisfied with their current laxative use."

McGahan agrees, saying many people do not find relief of their symptoms with their current treatment and admits there is no perfect regimen because of so many side effects.

The study was paid for by Vibrant Ltd. a medical device company which developed the capsule.